I would like to take a moment to apologize for The possible/potential misunderstandings of "my" communicative expression on the forum as of late. I have come to a point in the journey where "my" understandings are not my own. I am in between  multiple layers of expression simultaneously. About half way through my time on this forum I stated that I would "teach" using expressions of 4d negative to 6-d expressions. I got to the point of realizing that it may be more "helpful" instead of talking/expressing/explaining, to "act out" what I was describing. Being able to see cause and effect at the same "time" allows for understandings that are not yet being experienced in a general sense. There is/will be a time or no time where these expressions are understood from the place of their intention,but for the time being, it is understood that this expression carries the potential of causing more confusion and creating distortions that are yet to be seen from the proper place of love/light.

For this reason, I apologize to the members of the forum and especially to those that may experience the distortion of this "negative" expression being directed towards them on a personal level.

I understand that many are currently experiencing the journey of the soul and ascending beyond the expression of the personality.

From "my" perspective, that journey is complete and the expression that is being experienced is more cosmic in nature. There is no longer and I, and there is no longer an us from where (I) am.

Namaste to All 

 I would like to take a moment to apologize for The possible/potential misunderstandings of "my" communicative expression on the forum as of late. I have come to a point in the journey where "my" understandings are not my own. I am in between  multiple layers of expression simultaneously. About half way through my time on this forum I stated that I would "teach" using expressions of 4d negative to 6-d expressions. I got to the point of realizing that it may be more "helpful" instead of talking/expressing/explaining, to "act out" what I was describing. Being able to see cause and effect at the same "time" allows for understandings that are not yet being experienced in a general sense. There is/will be a time or no time where these expressions are understood from the place of their intention,but for the time being, it is understood that this expression carries the potential of causing more confusion and creating distortions that are yet to be seen from the proper place of love/light.

For this reason, I apologize to the members of the forum and especially to those that may experience the distortion of this "negative" expression being directed towards them on a personal level.

I understand that many are currently experiencing the journey of the soul and ascending beyond the expression of the personality.

From "my" perspective, that journey is complete and the expression that is being experienced is more cosmic in nature. There is no longer and I, and there is no longer an us from where (I) am.

Namaste to All 

the ebb and flow of consciousness continuing its journey

we truly are multi-dimensional

see you ..... out there my friend

our body is a chariot, we are on the advanced level of learning how to drive/experience it better, metaphorically speaking

Thank you to ALL that responded and ALL that do not and...

Your response Ivy provides me with a perfect opportunity to elaborate. If I were to (start) working on a new "beefed up" "appropriate" lexicon for such experiences, by the (time) I were to finish it would be relatively obsolete. The experience that I am having is with the "us" that no longer communicates with language of that type. The apology is a gesture to those who may not see the intentions behind the actions from the intended place of their origin.

I see it as a very positive thing when language is being "grown out" of. It is too "small" to contain our essence and we will not be "needing" it. 


To quote one of the "Back to the future" movies

Roads?
Where we're going we don't need roads.

And your right. It is perpetuating a distinction.

Paradoxes do your best.

   
 
 

Together We see ALL sides

 



 

ABC's first album was called "Lexicon of Love"

Alpha     1+3+7+8+1=20
Bet        2+5+2=9
City       3+9+2+7=21

20+9+21=5

Their 5th Album 

There is only offensiveness if one "chooses to feel" offended... People also create their own distortions so why bother non-e  .

But yeah I have a "disclaimer" lol .

no apologies necessary as far as I'm concerned.  keep the thought-flow coming.  when one grows, we all grow. 

Yeah I'm "engorging" already .

It's nice to see someone taking responsibility for the hurtful and sometimes hateful words used in the name of enlightenment.
It's a pity some others on this forum don't care who they slander.
Love and light! don't make me laugh

it seems as though i do not have a "clear" picture on what inclined this apology but i do have a rough idea

through my experience.. if it wasn't for certain individuals "acting out" i probably would have gained much less.. i'm not even sure the people were consciously aware of what they were doing but that is aside from the point.. if someone is choosing to act as catalyst then i am quite certain they completely understand whatever ramifications etc exist and in my opinion... it's all good'.

one might develop a grudge which they will later be grateful for due to the grudge leading them to far greater exploration. i have been "victim" of such grudges and I sure am grateful for them.

it's been quite the road as i am sure it has been for all of us..

you're beautiful, i'm beautiful, all is beautiful. next stop? you decide.

Heh yeah Evo, you got it right there. Catalysts indeed... Funny how I got slightly annoyed again , thanks for reminding me ^_^.

True CSI, whatever path one takes is the right one imho, especially if from certain perspectives it is seen as "bad, wrong, negative, ignorant or whatever". A yourney of learning is there no matter what you do...

Peace.

For the sake of further clarification for any selves that are not in "understanding" of the intended reason behind the explanation, I will restate for the sake of "clarity". There already exists within the archetypal framework of portions of mind the seperated portions of the self that exist within the self. If there was no split in the mind of the experiencer on certain planes, then that which is seen as self doubt, self battle, the desire to be liberated from some kind of "sense" of separation, then one may not experience that which can be understood as the opposite of that which is being sought after. I have stated that I was acting through an expression consciously which was in a distorted sense, "other than" the expression that may "naturally" express the plane that my consciousness is temporarily resting on. This was done to demon-strate the expression of such a spiritual archetype, a function of the psyche, and an expression in group consciousness experiences. As has been demonstrated and continues to do so in this post is the illusory distance between the self and otherselves. Every action or expression affords one the opportunity to experience the unity of all expression or the separation into fragments.

There is no separation in the one consciousness, except the fragmented portions that are yet to I-dentify itself with the one self.
There is also paradox in the use of the word natural expression within its usage by "myself" as if it were not natural for me to make the choice to act out such expressions, when from my perspective there is no distinction in the choice to do so.

So, Don't "make me" come back here and try to justify this as If I don't realize that I'm not talking to "myself" 

Is it me or is this emoticon sarcastic? 

it will make sense to those who seek making sense of it.. aside from that? words some of which "i" made sense of

 

It's nice to see someone taking responsibility for the hurtful and sometimes hateful words used in the name of enlightenment.
It's a pity some others on this forum don't care who they slander.
Love and light! don't make me laugh

Yep i know what yea mean

Quote from: Mast'G.K. on March 17, 2010, 01:41:44 PM

Is it me or is your post not as clear to others as you might think it is ? .

 "I" don't "think" about "others". 

Iv come to to this late i have to say man i havent got a clue what your apologies are for! 

Quote from: non-e-raygun on March 16, 2010, 09:42:33 PM

Is it me or is this emoticon sarcastic? 

it can be seen a number of ways... maybe behind the sarcasm there exists malicious intent... maybe not...

does it all boil down to perspective...once again???

Such was the point of that "rhetorical" question.